Remembering John W. Creasy (1956-2003)

Who was John W. Creasy, and what significance does his lifespan hold?

The string "Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003" signifies a specific period of time, marking the lifespan of John W. Creasy. This date range is crucial for understanding the context and scope of any article or research focusing on this individual.

Identifying the dates of birth and death is essential for biographical research and historical context. It allows researchers to place the person's life within a specific chronological framework, understanding the era in which they lived and the events that may have influenced their experiences. This temporal context is vital for evaluating the person's impact and understanding their work within the broader historical arc. Further, understanding the period can be important for determining the influence of historical events on a person's work, or for assessing the cultural environment during which they lived.

The provided date range, in conjunction with the name, serves as a key element for research on John W. Creasy. Articles examining their life, work, or contributions would rely on this data to establish the boundaries of their existence and to provide critical background. This data can then be integrated into a broader discussion on the subject's influence, legacy, or the broader historical period during which they lived and worked.

John W. Creasy (Jan 21, 1956 Dec 16, 2003)

Understanding the life and times of John W. Creasy requires a consideration of key aspects spanning his lifespan. This includes biographical details, historical context, and potential influence.

• Birthdate
• Deathdate
• Lifespan
• Profession
• Historical period
• Possible influences
• Impact

These seven aspects provide a structured approach to understanding John W. Creasy. For instance, his birthdate and deathdate pinpoint the temporal window for his existence. Knowledge of his profession gives context to his activities. The historical period during which he lived (e.g., technological advancements, social movements, political climates) can shed light on the influences impacting his life and work. Determining the scope of his impact, whether professional, personal, or broader, is crucial to evaluating his significance. Examining these facets offers a more comprehensive portrait of the person and his place in history.

1. Birthdate

The birthdate, January 21, 1956, is a fundamental component of the phrase "John W. Creasy Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003." It establishes a crucial point of reference for understanding the temporal scope of the subject's life. This date, combined with the death date, defines the entirety of a person's lifespan, providing a framework for analysis.

• Temporal Contextualization
  

  The birthdate anchors the individual within a specific historical period. This period is crucial for understanding the prevailing cultural, social, and technological environments that may have shaped the person's experiences, values, and motivations. Examining societal shifts and trends during this time can provide additional insight into the individual's life.

• Developmental Stages
  

  Understanding a person's birthdate allows for consideration of developmental stages relevant to that timeframe. Different life events, such as education, career choices, and familial or social relationships, may be significantly influenced by societal norms and technological advancements prevalent during specific periods. This connection can provide additional layers of insight.

• Generational Influences
  

  Birthdate informs generational classifications, which may be relevant for investigating similarities or contrasts in attitudes, beliefs, and approaches to various life situations. Understanding a persons generation in relation to wider societal changes provides crucial context for their outlook and behaviors.

• Historical Research
  

  The birthdate serves as a critical element for historical research and analysis. Researchers utilize dates to establish the person's existence within a specific time frame and investigate how historical events may have influenced them. Knowing the timeline of a person's life is essential to examining the context in which their decisions, actions, and achievements unfolded.

In conclusion, the birthdate, along with the death date, is a vital component of any biographical study. It provides the framework for understanding a person's life within a broader historical and developmental context, thereby enriching the study and analysis of John W. Creasy and his lifespan.

2. Deathdate

The death date, December 16, 2003, completes the chronological framework established by "John W. Creasy Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003." This date signifies the end of Creasy's life, providing a critical boundary for examining his life's trajectory and potential impact. Understanding this endpoint is essential for any scholarly or analytical exploration of his existence.

• Temporal Boundary
  

  The death date defines the precise duration of Creasy's life, establishing the temporal limits within which to examine his experiences and contributions. This timeframe is crucial for assessing the context of his activities and achievements against the backdrop of the historical period.

• Closure and Legacy
  

  The death date marks the cessation of Creasy's direct participation in life's events. It prompts reflection on his legacy and the impact he may have had on others. Understanding the date allows for a comprehensive assessment of the influences shaping his work and life, and the eventual conclusion of that life.

• Historical Context
  

  The year of death provides a specific point in history against which to analyze societal factors, prevailing trends, and influential events that may have shaped Creasy's life or work. Analyzing the period surrounding the death date can offer context for understanding his experiences and influences.

• Research Focus
  

  The death date guides research efforts. Scholars examining Creasy's life and work must consider this date in relation to any documented material or events occurring before and after it. By focusing on the end point of Creasy's life, research can offer detailed analysis of the events, achievements and influences that shaped his life and work.

In conclusion, the death date is an integral element of the biographical framework of "John W. Creasy Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003." It provides a necessary endpoint, fostering a nuanced understanding of Creasy's life, contributions, and impact within the historical context of his existence. This understanding is vital for effective research and interpretation.

3. Lifespan

The concept of "lifespan," as represented by "John W. Creasy Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003," signifies the period between birth and death. This temporal frame is fundamental to understanding any individual's life, actions, and contributions. Examining this lifespan provides a crucial context for evaluating the person's existence within a specific historical period.

• Chronological Framework
  

  The lifespan establishes a chronological framework for analyzing the life of John W. Creasy. This framework allows for a structured examination of events occurring during his lifetime, evaluating how these events may have influenced his actions, decisions, and development. Key events, both personal and societal, can be situated within the overall timeframe.

• Historical Contextualization
  

  The lifespan provides a critical context for understanding the historical period in which John W. Creasy lived. This includes social, cultural, and political trends prevalent during this time. Analysis of these trends provides insight into the backdrop against which Creasy's life unfolded, offering a deeper understanding of his motivations, experiences, and choices.

• Generational Influences
  

  The lifespan period allows for consideration of generational influences on John W. Creasy. This entails examining the impact of societal norms, technological advancements, and cultural shifts on his upbringing and development. The period between 1956 and 2003 likely involved significant societal transformations affecting his life experiences.

• Development and Trajectory
  

  By understanding the period of John W. Creasy's life, one can examine the phases of his development, including education, career progression, personal relationships, and broader life experiences. This perspective provides a more comprehensive view of the individual and the factors contributing to their life trajectory.

The provided lifespan, "John W. Creasy Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003," acts as a crucial anchor point in biographical and historical research. The combination of the birthdate and deathdate, along with the inclusion of the individual's name, encapsulates a significant component of the individual's narrative. Further examination of this period illuminates the context in which John W. Creasy lived, worked, and interacted with the world around him.

4. Profession

The profession of John W. Creasy, while not explicitly stated in the provided data "John W. Creasy Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003," is a crucial component for understanding the individual's life and impact. Knowing his profession reveals the context within which his lifespan occurred. The type of work undertaken influences daily routines, social interactions, and career development, all aspects shaping a person's life story. Without knowing his profession, the full understanding of his experiences and contributions is limited.

For instance, if Creasy's profession was a doctor, analysis might include his specialization, the hospitals or clinics associated with his practice, the medical advancements or trends during his career. If his profession was a teacher, research could encompass the educational institutions where he worked, the subjects taught, and the educational policies and trends of the era. The profession directly connects to the individual's social circle, influencing experiences, opportunities, and potential contributions to society. Identifying his profession enables a more specific and in-depth examination of his life and legacy, revealing the potential connections between his career and the broader societal and historical context. Examples include analyzing the professions evolution, identifying related social networks and potential areas of impact within the communities served.

In summary, while the provided data "John W. Creasy Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003" provides a timeline, understanding Creasy's profession is essential for richer analysis. It contextualizes his experiences and activities, connects his life to wider trends, and provides specific avenues for investigation into his contributions. This information is vital for constructing a more complete and impactful biography.

5. Historical Period

The historical period encompassing John W. Creasy's life, from January 21, 1956, to December 16, 2003, is crucial for understanding his experiences, motivations, and potential contributions. Analyzing the prevailing social, political, and cultural trends during this time provides context for interpreting his actions and choices.

• Technological Advancements
  

  The mid-20th century to the early 21st century witnessed transformative technological changes. These changesfrom the rise of computers and the internet to advancements in communication and transportationlikely impacted Creasy's life in various ways. Examining these developments offers insight into the opportunities and challenges he faced. For example, the evolution of information technology could have influenced his work, education, or personal communication patterns.

• Social and Cultural Shifts
  

  Societal and cultural landscapes were in flux during this period. Significant social movements, evolving gender roles, changing values, and shifts in cultural norms could have influenced Creasy's personal and professional life. For instance, the civil rights movement, women's rights movements, or the increasing visibility of diverse cultures could have directly or indirectly shaped his experiences and perspectives. Examining such shifts reveals potential influences on attitudes, beliefs, and actions.

• Political and Economic Conditions
  

  Political and economic conditions significantly affect individuals and societies. The political climates and economic structures of the mid-20th century to the early 21st century likely presented varying opportunities and constraints for Creasy. Understanding these conditions helps contextualize his decisions and the broader context of his life.

• Major Events and Trends
  

  Significant events, such as wars, economic crises, major political shifts, or prominent cultural movements during this period could have greatly influenced the context of John W. Creasy's life. Analyzing the connections between these events and his life, potentially identifying any specific impact these may have had, yields a deeper understanding of his experiences.

By examining the historical period from 1956 to 2003, researchers can gain a more complete picture of the conditions that shaped John W. Creasy's life and work. This understanding of the prevailing context is crucial for a thorough assessment of his individual experiences and contributions.

6. Possible Influences

Identifying potential influences on John W. Creasy, considering the dates of his life (January 21, 1956 December 16, 2003), is crucial. These influences encompass a wide range of factors, from familial and educational experiences to societal trends and historical events. Understanding these influences is essential to grasping the complexities of his life and contributions. The absence of specific details about Creasy necessitates a focus on potential influence categories rather than definitive statements. These categories, while not definitively provable, highlight the types of forces that could have molded his development and actions.

For example, familial structures and socioeconomic conditions during his childhood and adolescence likely shaped his values and aspirations. Educational institutions and teachers could have profoundly impacted his intellectual development and career choices. Interactions with peers and mentors, and the broader societal context of the time, including prevailing social norms and political climates, would have played a significant role in his personal and professional life. Analysis of historical events, such as major wars, economic downturns, and technological innovations, provides insights into potential influences on his life trajectory and worldview. Further, cultural shifts and social movements may have significantly impacted his perspectives and motivations. Without specific details, generalizations must be made, recognizing the potential influence these factors could have exerted.

In conclusion, while the exact nature of "possible influences" remains speculative in the absence of detailed biographical information, recognizing their fundamental role is vital. Understanding these potential forces provides a framework for future research. This approach enables researchers to explore how different factors might have intersected to shape Creasy's life, highlighting the crucial role of contextual understanding in biographical analysis. This understanding is essential for any comprehensive analysis of an individual's life and potential contributions, given the temporal context and the limitations of available data.

7. Impact

Assessing the "impact" of John W. Creasy (Jan 21, 1956 - Dec 16, 2003) hinges on available information. Without specifics regarding his profession, achievements, or contributions, evaluating impact becomes a complex exploration of potential influence. This exploration must acknowledge the limitations imposed by the lack of detailed biographical data.

• Potential Scope of Influence
  

  The absence of explicit details about Creasy's professional endeavors or achievements limits the scope of discernible impact. Possible areas of influence, however, include social networks, interpersonal relationships, and community engagement. For example, if Creasy held a leadership position within a community organization, his impact could be measured by the organization's growth or development during his tenure. Alternatively, if Creasy was a renowned artist or writer, the impact might be gauged through the recognition and influence their work held during their lifetime.

• Indirect Influence Through Relationships
  

  Impact can extend beyond direct contributions. Creasy's relationships with colleagues, mentors, or mentees might have fostered personal and professional growth. The transmission of knowledge, skills, or inspiration could have ripple effects throughout their networks, leading to a broader, less tangible impact over time. For example, interactions with students or colleagues could have shaped the careers or worldviews of numerous individuals. Examining possible networks for influence helps to better grasp the potential magnitude of impact.

• Historical Contextual Impact
  

  The historical period in which Creasy lived (1956-2003) provides a framework for evaluating possible contextual influences. Understanding the political, social, or technological landscape of that time can reveal the context within which Creasy may have operated and the potential impact he might have had on that backdrop. Analyzing the historical trends during this era is crucial to evaluating his relative impact, potentially illustrating influences on or by his work.

• Limitations of Assessment
  

  Without detailed biographical information, assessing Creasy's impact remains inherently limited. The evaluation must acknowledge that the available data, namely the dates, lacks specifics regarding accomplishments. Further investigation into specific areas of Creasy's life or work is essential to accurately assess the significance of his presence and contributions.

In conclusion, evaluating the impact of John W. Creasy requires a nuanced approach. Without specific details of his profession or accomplishments, analysis must concentrate on the potential domains of influence, considering his relationships, historical context, and the inherent limitations of the available information. Future research, if biographical information becomes available, can significantly enhance this analysis and provide a more definite understanding of his impact.

Frequently Asked Questions about John W. Creasy (Jan 21, 1956 Dec 16, 2003)

This section addresses common inquiries regarding the life and potential impact of John W. Creasy, given the limited biographical information available from the provided date range.

Question 1: What is known about John W. Creasy?

Limited biographical data is available for John W. Creasy. The provided dates (January 21, 1956 December 16, 2003) establish the timeframe of his life but offer little beyond this chronological context. Specific details concerning his profession, accomplishments, or contributions remain unknown. Consequently, any further insights are speculative, reliant on potential connections with the historical and social contexts of that period.

Question 2: What was John W. Creasy's profession?

The provided data does not specify John W. Creasy's profession. Without this information, understanding his contributions or impact is limited. Potential professional fields and associated impacts can only be speculated upon.

Question 3: What was the historical context of John W. Creasy's life?

The period spanning from 1956 to 2003 encompassed significant social, technological, and political transformations. Understanding these broader historical shifts offers valuable contextualization for interpreting potential aspects of Creasy's life, although without further biographical data, direct connections remain elusive.

Question 4: How might John W. Creasy's lifespan have influenced his life?

The length of John W. Creasy's lifespan, combined with the broader historical trends during that time, could have influenced his personal and professional experiences. Without biographical specifics, however, the precise nature of this influence remains conjectural.

Question 5: What is the significance of John W. Creasy?

Without comprehensive biographical data, determining the significance of John W. Creasy is impossible. The presented timeframe, while providing chronological context, lacks the necessary details to assess his potential impact. Further research with supplementary information is needed to establish significance.

In summary, the limited information provided only establishes the timeline of John W. Creasy's life. Further biographical data is necessary to adequately address questions concerning his professional field, historical context, personal influences, and overall impact.

The subsequent section will delve deeper into methods for researching individuals using limited data sets, focusing on the importance of comprehensive biographical information for a meaningful understanding.

Conclusion

The phrase "John W. Creasy Jan 21 1956 - Dec 16 2003" serves primarily as a temporal marker, defining the lifespan of an individual. This limited data, while providing a foundational chronological framework, necessitates further investigation to elucidate the subject's life, profession, and impact. Analysis of the historical period encompassing this lifespan offers context for understanding potential influences. However, without additional biographical details, assessing the significance of John W. Creasy remains inherently circumscribed. The absence of specific information about his profession, achievements, or contributions to society necessitates a focus on possibilities rather than definitive conclusions. This exploration underscores the crucial role that comprehensive biographical data plays in historical and biographical research. Subsequent inquiries into available records or potential sources of biographical information are vital for a more complete understanding of this individual.

Further research, utilizing available biographical sources, could potentially reveal the specific contributions and impact of John W. Creasy within the context of his era. This endeavor, by bridging the gap between the limited information and the broader historical landscape, could provide a more complete understanding of the person's life and lasting influence. The present analysis highlights the limitations of making definitive pronouncements based on incomplete data, emphasizing the importance of meticulous and comprehensive research when seeking a deeper understanding of individuals and their historical context.